Meganiese Tekene En Ontwerp Us N6 — Document

August 2018 — N6 — Meganiese Tekene En Ontwerp Us

N6 2018 Nated Engineering

↓ Download PDF ✓ View Memorandum 📄 201.3 KB

Preparing document

📋 Document Analysis

🎯 100 marks ⏱️ 4h 📄 4 pages 📝 10 items found

See full analysis

Questions — A Preview of What to Expect in the Document

This section provides a quick preview of questions from the document. It may not display every question or the complete wording of each one. For the full content, including diagrams, tables and other information, view the original PDF above.

Q1— Section header —

1.1Die aantal tande en die steeksirkeldiameter van gedrewe rat B (6\

1.2Of daar geen steuring tussen die ratte is nie (4\

1.3Die geskikte vlakbreedte volgens die Lewisformule, en gaan na of dit binne perke is (15\

1.4Die maksimum wringkrag van die gedrewe as (veronderstel 'n 15% oorlas (4\

1.5Die maksimum buigmoment op die gedrewe as (36\ 8090086 T1090(A\(A3\

1.6Die geskikte diameter van die gedrewe as (verontagsaam die skok en vermoeidheidsfaktor\ (10\

1.7Die resulterende radiale las op albei laers (4\

1.8

1.9Die geskikte binnediameter vir die sentrifugale koppelaartrommel (9\ [100] TOTAAL: 100 8090086 T1090(A\(A3\100

Mark Allocation

Total100 marks

Sections100 = 100 marks

Paper information

TitleDocument

SubjectMeganiese Tekene En Ontwerp Us

LevelN6

Document typeQuestion paper

Year2018

MonthAugust

Pages5

Downloads2

Examination context

Decade2010s

Years ago8y

SeasonWinter (SH)

Start dayWednesday

Exam periodAugust 2018

Days since exam2,992

About Meganiese Tekene En Ontwerp Us examination preparation

This TVET examination resource can be used as part of a structured revision programme. Past papers are most useful when learners attempt questions independently, work within a realistic time limit, and review their answers afterwards.

How to use this resource for revision

A TVET past examination paper is most useful when it is treated as an active revision exercise. Try the questions yourself before checking the corresponding memorandum. Where you make an error, identify the reason — was it a knowledge gap, a calculation mistake, an interpretation issue, or an examination technique problem?

For stronger examination practice, complete the paper without unnecessary interruptions and keep track of the questions that take the most time. Afterwards, review the memorandum and separate knowledge gaps from mistakes caused by interpretation, calculation, structure, or examination technique.

understanding question requirements

applying subject knowledge

working under time constraints

checking answers

identifying revision priorities

A practical revision approach

Start by completing the resource without looking at the memorandum. Review incorrect and incomplete answers afterwards and make a short revision list based on the areas that caused difficulty.

File details

File size201.3 KB

Pages5

Archived on8 September 2026

File age45d

ContributorFreeMode

Fingerprint59E3001B2705

Questions and learner discussion

No questions or discussions have been posted yet.