Foundry Theory N1 — Document

April 2018 — N1 — Foundry Theory

N1 2018 Nated Engineering

↓ Download PDF 📄 117.3 KB

Preparing document

📋 Document Analysis

🎯 100 marks ⏱️ 3h 📄 4 pages 📝 26 items found

See full analysis

Questions — A Preview of What to Expect in the Document

This section provides a quick preview of questions from the document. It may not display every question or the complete wording of each one. For the full content, including diagrams, tables and other information, view the original PDF above.

Q1— Section header —

1.1Rounded grains (8\

1.2Sub angular grains (2\

1.3Angular grains (6\ Compounded grains (9\ [25]25

Q2— Section header —

Q3— Section header —

3.1Moulds (6\

3.2Cores (5\ [11]11

Q4— Section header —

Q5— Section header —

Q6— Section header —

6.1Alloy

6.2Blow hole

6.3Cheek

6.4Cold shut

6.5Draft

6.6Flask

6.7Green sand core

6.8Jig

6.9Poros ity

6.10Rapping (10 2\ [20]20

Q7— Section header —

7.1Describe the method of lining a large ladle. (5\

7.2Why should the bottom lining be thicker than the sides? (2\

7.3What precautions would you take to allow the escape of gases generated in the lining? (5\

7.4What is the result of insufficient or careless drying of the lining? (5\ [17] TOTAL: 10017

Mark Allocation

Total100 marks

Sections25 + 10 + 11 + 7 + 10 + 20 + 17 = 100 marks

Paper information

TitleDocument

SubjectFoundry Theory

LevelN1

Document typeQuestion paper

Year2018

MonthApril

Pages4

Downloads2

Examination context

Decade2010s

Years ago8y

SeasonAutumn (SH)

Start daySunday

Exam periodApril 2018

Days since exam3,115

About Foundry Theory examination preparation

This TVET examination resource can be used as part of a structured revision programme. Past papers are most useful when learners attempt questions independently, work within a realistic time limit, and review their answers afterwards.

How to use this resource for revision

A TVET past examination paper is most useful when it is treated as an active revision exercise. Try the questions yourself before checking the corresponding memorandum. Where you make an error, identify the reason — was it a knowledge gap, a calculation mistake, an interpretation issue, or an examination technique problem?

For stronger examination practice, complete the paper without unnecessary interruptions and keep track of the questions that take the most time. Afterwards, review the memorandum and separate knowledge gaps from mistakes caused by interpretation, calculation, structure, or examination technique.

understanding question requirements

applying subject knowledge

working under time constraints

checking answers

identifying revision priorities

A practical revision approach

Start by completing the resource without looking at the memorandum. Review incorrect and incomplete answers afterwards and make a short revision list based on the areas that caused difficulty.

File details

File size117.3 KB

Pages4

Archived on8 September 2026

File age47d

ContributorFreeMode

Fingerprint9F9B0A6975D4

Questions and learner discussion

No questions or discussions have been posted yet.